
Prof. Chinmoy Ghosh
Photo credit: University of Connecticut |
Sujata Srinivasan interviewed Dr.
Chinmoy Ghosh, head of the Department of Finance at
the School of Business, University of Connecticut. He
is also the executive director of the Financial
Services Accelerator, which includes a $2 million
student managed fund. Here, Ghosh talks about the new
Master of Science in Financial Risk Management (MSFRM)
program set to commence this fall at the Stamford
campus, of which he is a co-developer and director.
Originally from India, Ghosh is a graduate of the
Presidency College, and the Indian Institute of
Management, Calcutta. He has lived in Connecticut
since 1986.
|
|
How is your risk management program different from
those offered at other universities?
The UConn MSFRM program will place more emphasis on
practical applications, and operational and behavioral
issues in risk management. Through collaboration with
the financial services industry in the State of
Connecticut, the program will provide a forum for
interaction of academics and practitioners to focus on
the practice of creating economic value by managing
exposure to risk.While the theoretical component will
be analytical and quantitative, the practice component
will emphasize the behavioral issues and human factors
in the design and implementation of internal control,
communication and governance of exposure to risk.
The lack of an education does not appear to have
caused the 2007-2010 global financial crisis, when
highly educated and experienced finance professionals
undervalued risk across the board, ranging from those
who priced mortgage backed securities to those who
gave it AAA rating. How differently will these people
approach risk, going forward?
No, the lack of knowledge or education was not the
main cause of the 2007-2010 global financial crisis.
The problem is that people tend to ignore risks when
the market is on an upward trend. Many new complex and
hybrid securities were created during this time. Many
of these instruments were originally created for
hedging purposes. However, speculators were using high
levels of leverage on these risky instruments. To make
matters worse, there is very little regulation in
these markets. So, it is wrong to say that investors
did not realize the risks. They just ignored it and
the absence of regulation allowed them to do so. I
believe that so many people have lost so much money
that there is now a greater awareness of risk than
ever before.
Can innovative modeling tools keep up with the
proliferation of extremely complex and innovative
derivatives, or is some other additional approach in
risk management required?
Yes, complex and innovative derivative securities are
difficult to explain to investors, and that is
unlikely to change. The approach is to train people to
articulate the underlying risks in simple terms, like
what is the maximum amount one can lose in a given
day. Risk mitigation is costly, so investors must also
be told how much it can cost them to mitigate some
risk. In my view, the most important change in the
market is the recognition of Risk Management as an
area that needs specially trained professionals, and
these professionals must be engaged in defining the
risk parameters of any portfolio.
How should the new risk manager approach external risk
factors such as an increasingly volatile global
financial climate coupled with the emergence of new
types of risks? Given the constant change, new models
become obsolete rather quickly.
Global financial climate is always shifting. It
represents tremendous opportunities and great risks
too. While it is true that new models must be
developed, the fundamentals of risk management remain
unchanged. The good news is that with the emergence of
new markets in Asia and Latin America, professionals
are acquiring training in financial risk management in
larger numbers. These individuals are not only trained
in the fundamentals, they are also conversant with the
unique culture and risks in their domestic countries.
They are also extremely proficient in the mathematical
and statistical models. International associations
like GARP (Global Association of Risk Professionals)
have regular training programs and certificate exams
to qualify risk professionals worldwide. So, the
environment for risk management training is improving
constantly.
How did all the warning systems fail in the recent
financial meltdown? Do companies have enough resources
to set up early warning systems and risk mitigation
tools?
Companies realize that the cost of not having a risk
management system is potential failure of their
business. That is why companies are now making
investments in training personnel in financial risk
management tools. ERM (Enterprise Risk Management) is
now practiced in every large company. In essence,
companies are trying to find resources and create
opportunities in risk management within the
organization. That trend is expected to continue.
The organizational model plays a key role in
identifying risk, a top-down process beginning with
senior executives. Who is your target student base?
This program is targeted to benefit risk management
professionals involved in the definition,
specification, measurement, pricing, and mitigation of
credit risk, interest rate risk, currency risk,
overall market risk, and operational risk in financial
asset management, wealth management, arbitrage
strategies, restructuring and combinations, and
alternative investments. Students aspiring to enter
the money management profession in pursuit of
long-term careers will also benefit from the program.
It is expected that most students will be drawn from
the large concentration of professionals engaged in
money management in the greater Stamford area.
What are some job opportunities for your students
upon graduation?
The recent economic crisis is likely to have long-term
effects on the financial sector, inducing structural
changes in response to stricter regulation and greater
oversight. Several functional areas in the financial
system may contract with adverse effects on career
opportunities in finance. While the viability of the
MSFRM program may be questionable in this environment,
based on our discussion with finance professionals and
alumni, we believe that the adverse impact on jobs
will be temporary, albeit longer than usual, and the
emphasis on the measurement and mitigation of risk
will create new career opportunities in financial risk
management for the graduates of our program. Offering
the program at Stamford is strategic because of the
concentration of the fund management industry in
Stamford.
|